Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of granulocyte colonystimulating factor drugs in prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients under healthcare settings in the Russian Federation
As part of this work a pharmacoeconomic study of prophylaxis for febrile neutropenia with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor drugs was carried out. Four prevention schemes of G-CSFs were compared: lipegfilgrastim, pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, lenograstim. As a result, it was found that prophylaxis with lipegfilgrastim is characterized by the lowest “cost-effectiveness” ratio (217,352 rubles) as compared to prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim (342,748 rub.), filgrastim (302,077 rub. for 11 days of prophylaxis), lenograstim (788,582 rub. for 11 days of prophylaxis) by the end of the 1st year of prophylaxis. In the context of budget impact analysis, the least costly scheme was prophylaxis with lipegfilgrastim (211,484 rubles) by the end of the 1st year when calculating per 1 patient. Costs in pegfilgrastim group resulted in 314,986 rubles, in filgrastim group (11 days of treatment) – 264,620 rubles, in lenograstim group (11 days of treatment) – 690,798 rubles. In the context of pharmacoeconomic analysis it is preferable to use lipegfilgrastim for prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia as compared to other G-CSFs (pegfilgrastim, filgrastim, lenograstim), as it allows to increase the number of patients who responded to prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia while reducing costs as compared to other granulocyte colonystimulating factor drugs.
Скорее всего ваш браузер не поддерживает PDF и Adobe Reader, нажмите здесь, чтобы просмотреть PDF
Bibliography link: Kulikov A.Yu., Ugrekhelidze D.T., Larionova V.B., Snegovoy A.V. Pharmacoeconomic analysis of the use of granulocyte colonystimulating factor drugs in prophylaxis of febrile neutropenia in cancer patients under healthcare settings in the Russian Federation // Pharmacoeconomics: theory and practice. - 2016. - Vol.4, №1. - P.195-201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30809/phe.1.2016.25